News

|

National Security

Canada shows how far out of his depth PM is with Trump

March 17, 2025

Monday 17 March 2025
NIck Carter
The Australian


 Last week, Anthony Albanese spent a relaxed 15 minutes talking about footy on  Nova Perth 93.7 before the conversation moved on to worthier matters, such as  Donald Trump. The PM voiced his concerns about Trump's tariffs on aluminium  and steel before the host steered the discussion to China.
 
 Shaun McManus said Chinese tariffs on barley, wine, crayfish and other  agricultural products had been "way more than 25 per cent".  "Plus, they're doing bogie laps around Australia where there are  frigates and stuff. That surely has to be more concerning."
 
 "Well, China, we fixed the relationship," Anthony Albanese  responded. "We fixed that through diplomacy."
 
 Of the many words that could describe the state of play between Australia and  China, "fixed" does not readily come to mind. Not after last  month's unannounced live-fire naval exercises, 150 nautical miles east of  Sydney, causing commercial flights to be re-routed between Australia and New  Zealand.
 
 If the Chinese navy is looking for a spot of target practice, there must be a  suitable location closer to home than the Tasman Sea, some 5500 nautical  miles from Shanghai.
 
 It was not the action of a friend. It was a show of strength designed to  intimidate and expose Australia's weakness. It succeeded. Albanese tried to  excuse China by saying its action was "in accordance with international  law".
 
 "We have boats in the South China Sea, and we do exercises all the  time," he said.
 
 Yet there is no moral equivalence between Australian rightof-passage  exercises in the South China Sea and China's reckless live-fire exercises  act. Australian ships and aircraft participate in those exercises with others  to protect international shipping lanes from China's imperial ambitions.
 
 China's claim to the Spratly and Parcel Islands and Scarborough Shoal is  based on the "NineDash Line", which the 2016 Hague Tribunal  rejected as having no legal basis under international law. Yet the PM thinks  he can smooth things over with a plate of shellfish.
 
 "The relationship is far improved," he told Nova Perth listeners.  "I brought the Chinese Premier here to WA, of course, last year, and  that was well received. We did have lobster for lunch. And that helped."
 
 The optimism inspired by Trump's second inauguration was short-lived. Trump  promised that America's power would "stop all wars and bring a new  spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent, and totally  unpredictable".
 
 His irascible diplomacy has achieved the very opposite.
 
 America's allies have reason to feel less safe now than they were under Joe  Biden, with the possible exception of Israel.
 
 In his attempts to assert America's moral authority, Trump has diminished it.  If he is prepared to rip up free-trade agreements, can we trust the US to  abide by its ANZUS obligation to act to meet a common danger if Australia and  New Zealand came under armed attack? Trump's worsening relations with Canada  should disabuse us of any idea that the US sees mutual value in defence and  trade partnerships. In Trump's zero-sum world, the only question is who is  screwing who.
 
 The development of the Alberta oil sands in Canada in the 1990s offered the  US a secure and stable oil supply away from the Middle East. In 2001, at the  start of the invasion of Iraq, the US was importing 2.7 billion barrels of  oil a day from the Persian Gulf. Last year, it was less than a fifth as much.
 
 Canadian imports in 2001 amounted to 1.8 billion a day. Last year, it was 4.6  billion a day. In Trump's zero-sum world, the US energy deficit with Canada  is an unmitigated negative.
 
 Yet, if flows from the Enbridge Mainline and Keystone Pipeline lessen the  risk of being forced to put boots on the ground in the Middle East, access to  Canadian oil will be an incalculable benefit to the US. The 10 per cent  tariff Trump intends to slap on Canadian energy exports only assists America's  enemies.
 
 If Trump thought Canada would crumble under its lameduck-woke prime minister,  Justin Trudeau, he underestimated Canada's residual national pride.
 
 Trudeau and his successor, Mark Carney, have surged in the polls, pulling  back much of the 20-point lead the Conservatives enjoyed before Christmas.
 
 Polling at the weekend found Carney neck and neck with the Conservatives'  Pierre Poilievre in an election expected to be called within weeks, if not  days.
 
 Albanese will find it much harder to exploit the Trump effect. Trudeau flew  to Mar-a-Lago in December to persuade the president-elect to see sense.  Albanese struggles to get the President to answer his phone call. He assured  Nova listeners on Friday that Australia would continue to argue its case.  "Kevin is working really hard," he added.
 
 In January, on the eve of Trump's inauguration, the PM broke the news on ABC  AM that Rudd had had a meeting with Trump. "There has been direct  contact, which is a good thing," Albanese said.
 
 Asked whether that meeting occurred at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, Albanese  would not say.
 
 "I'll leave that detail to go through to the keeper," he said.  "We engage diplomatically, rather than go into those details. That's how  we get things done, that's how you do diplomacy, and that's how you get  results."
 
 In February, Senator James Paterson sought more detail in Senate estimates  from Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade  officials.
 
 Paterson: "Can you tell me the date of that direct contact?" DFAT  secretary Jan Adams: "I might have to take that on notice."
 
 Paterson: "Can you say where the meeting was?" Wong: "I refer  to the previous answer."
 
 Paterson: "Do you know whether it was a sit-down meeting?" Elly  Lawson, deputy secretary, strategic planning: "I will take it on  notice."
 
 Paterson: "How long it was scheduled for?" Lawson: "I will  take that on notice."
 
 Paterson: "Do you know whether it was organised by the embassy or by a  third party?" Lawson: "I'll take that on notice."
 
 Paterson: "Was a diplomatic cable produced following the meeting?"  Lawson: "We will provide you with all of these."
 
 What we know about the meeting, if it took place, is that it did not dissuade  Australia's most important ally from slapping tariffs on our aluminium and  steel.
 
 We know, too, that our relationship with the US is at its lowest since the  Whitlam government, and the PM is way out of his depth.
 
 Albanese will find it much harder to exploit the Trump effect. Trudeau flew  to Mar-aLago in December to persuade the president-elect to see sense.
 
 Albanese struggles to get the President to answer his phone call. He assured  Nova listeners on Friday that Australia would continue to argue its case.  "Kevin is working really hard," he added

Recent News

All Posts