News

|

National Security

Labor accused of payback against ASPI think tank

December 20, 2024

Friday 20 December 2024
TomMcilroy And Emma Connors
The Australian Financial Review


 
 The Coalition has accused Labor of targeted payback against a think tank for  its criticism of China and has warned that the recommendations of a review  into strategic policy advice will weaken engagement with Washington just as  Donald Trump returns to the White House.
 
 The review of $40 million of annual think-tank funding suggests that block  funding of four institutions including the Canberra-based Australian  Strategic Policy Institute should be replaced by competitive bids in the  coming years. It also wants to close the ASPI office in Washington that was  opened with a $5 million grant just a few years ago.
 
 Labor's decision to agree fully or in principle with most of the review's  recommendations prompted the Coalition to accuse it of bias against ASPI.
 
 The timing of the government's response which came five months after it  received the report's recommendations has also angered those affected.
 
 ''It's surprising, disappointing and a misjudgment,'' said ASPI executive  director Justin Bassi. ''With wars in Europe and the Middle East, increased  aggression in the South China Sea, daily reports of cyberattacks, and the  beginning of a very important Trump administration, the decision to cut  funding to a Washington office is untimely to say the least.''
 
 The looming federal election further complicated planning, he said. The  Coalition has vowed to reverse any funding changes, meaning the Washington  office funding could possibly be cut and then reinstated before it runs out  on June 30.
 
 ASPI council member and former deputy prime minister John Anderson slammed  Labor for appearing to cave in to Beijing's demands as set out in a 2020 list  of ''14 grievances'' that included government funding for ''anti-China''  research.
 
 ''I regard the review as dreadful, frankly. I am amazed the government has  picked it up. Plainly it gives the government of the day the ability to  nobble ASPI's work,'' he said.
 
 ''It would be seen as a capitulation in Beijing and Washington. It will be  seen as a capitulation to the 14 demands.
 
 There is no other way of putting it and I think the optics are dreadful.''
 
 Mr Anderson, who was in cabinet when the Howard government first funded ASPI  in 2001, threatened to quit the think tank's board.
 
 The review carried out by University of Queensland chancellor Peter Varghese  also recommends that the government get involved in think-tank activities,  including through the leaders of national security agencies helping direct  work priorities.
 
 The government backed the review's call to end recurring funding for ASPI,  the United States Studies Centre and two other think tanks, though a two year  extension of current funding would mean the institutions would not have to  compete for a new round until June 2027.
 
 ASPI believes the end of recurring funding would make it more difficult to do  the job the Howard government set it up to do: provide government with  ''external contestability''.
 
 Not everyone agrees. Other think tanks that don't get block funding believe  it is an unfair advantage and say few institutions operate on that basis  internationally. However, the Varghese review is widely seen to have been  politically motivated even by those who agree with the recommendations.
 
 Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said shutting the ASPI  Washington office would be a mistake and would weaken ties between Canberra  and the new Trump administration.
 
 ''This is the time that we should be looking to maximise our influence in  Washington, DC, as almost every other government in the world is doing,'' he  said.
 
 ''We know that ASPI was hugely influential on the thinking of the first Trump  administration, and we should want to maintain that, not weaken it.''
 
 Senator Paterson said Labor should avoid any decisions that would make think  tanks such as ASPI subject to the whims of the government of the day.
 
 ''I don't think the government has appreciated the criticism that ASPI has  made of some of their policy agenda, on defence and national security, and  they clearly want to bring them to heel,'' he said.
 
 ASPI's block funding was, until the Albanese government's election win in  2022, rolled over every five years. ASPI's accounts show these funds made up  28 per cent of its revenue in the 2023 financial year. Additional funding  from various federal government agencies accounted for another 29.2 per cent.
 
 The think tank has written about Chinese military involvement in Australian  universities, the spread of Uighur detention camps in Xinjiang and Chinese  intelligence agents.
 
 It would be seen as a capitulation in Beijing and Washington.
 
 John Anderson, former deputy PM

Recent News

All Posts