News

|

Community Safety

Labor retools laws after court loss

November 7, 2024

Thursday 07 November 2024
Natassia Chrysanthos
The Age


 Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke will urgently introduce new laws aimed at  restoring ankle bracelets and curfews for former immigration detainees, after  the High Court struck down the Albanese government's monitoring regime by  finding it was punitive and unconstitutional.
 
 Labor sought to fend off a fresh political storm after a majority of justices  ruled yesterday the federal government did not have the authority to impose  curfews or electronic tracking devices on 140 former detainees released into  the community since last year.
 
 Threatened with a Coalition attack on immigration and community safety, as  opposition frontbenchers immediately called on Labor to explain its plans to  keep people safe, Burke said he would sign off on the regulations last night  to adjust processes so electronic monitoring and curfews could still be used.
 
 ''[On Thursday] I will introduce new legislation to support those  regulations. The legislation will also strengthen the government's power to  remove people who have had their visas cancelled to third countries,'' Burke  said.
 
 The government's move comes despite the High Court ruling the measures were  designed to punish people and therefore infringed upon the separation of  government and court powers in the Constitution, making them invalid. Lawyers  warned they could again be subject to legal challenges.
 
 The High Court case was brought by a 36-year-old stateless refugee, known as  YBFZ, whose lawyers sought to challenge controversial laws the Albanese  government rushed through last December after the High Court ruled it was  unlawful to indefinitely detain non-citizens who cannot be deported.
 
 That court case, brought by a Rohingya man known as NZYQ, released into the  community 152 people held in immigration detention after serving prison  sentences many for serious criminal convictions, including murder and rape.
 
 As of October, there were 215 people released into the community following  the NZYQ ruling. They included 12 people convicted of murder or attempted  murder, 66 convicted sex offenders and 97 people convicted of assault. Five  had a minimal or no criminal record.
 
 Of the cohort, 126 were subject to 10pm-to-6am curfews and 143 must wear an  electronic monitoring device conditions yesterday's decision said must end.
 
 YBFZ's lawyer, David Manne, said the ruling was a ''major victory for  fundamental freedoms and the rule of law in Australia''.
 
 ''It underscores the bedrock principle, that for everyone whether citizens or  non-citizens the government does not have the power to punish people by  stripping them of their fundamental rights to freedom and dignity,'' he said.
 
 But the Coalition called the government's loss embarrassing as they pushed  Labor to re-establish tough measures.
 
 ''The government repeatedly assured us that the amendments they drafted were  constitutionally sound, and as recently as Monday in Senate estimates  promised they had comprehensive contingency plans in place if they were  unsuccessful in this case,'' a joint statement from James Paterson, Dan Tehan  and Michaelia Cash said.
 
 ''This loss compounds the failure of the Albanese government to use the  preventative detention powers the parliament rushed through almost 12 months  ago to re-detain any high-risk offenders.''
 
 Burke insisted the government had prepared for the decision. In addition to  new laws and regulations, he said Labor had boosted dedicated police  resources and lifted the number of officers supervising orders by 66 per  cent.
 
 But Barrister Greg Barns, of the Australian Lawyers Alliance, lamented calls  for more emergency legislation, saying the ruling was a reminder ''political  expediency and public hysteria are not the right basis on which to make  laws''.
 
 ''Urgent laws are often poorly drafted and are successfully challenged in the  courts,'' Barns said. He said a key point with the NZYQ caseload was that  they had already served their sentences.
 
 The government unsuccessfully defended the laws, arguing they were not a form  of punishment but instead an alternative response to managing non-citizens  who could not be deported.

Recent News

All Posts